Literature Decoded

Living reprintoriginally published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2025CC BY 4.0Read the version of record Opt out

Literature DecodedLiving reprint
Living reprint · journal article Journal version available

Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review

Systematic review first published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine (2025), reprinted in full under its CC BY 4.0 licence.

Kristine Mundal1ORCID iD 0009-0002-9360-2045, Andrew G. Geeslin2, Eirik Solheim3, Eivind Inderhaug1*

1Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway2Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Aleris Nesttun Bergen, Bergen, Norway*Corresponding author

Reprinted 2026-10-01 11 min read Living reprint · journal article Version of record: The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2025Licence: CC BY 4.0

Reading mode
In plain languageSystematic review first published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine (2025), reprinted in full under its CC BY 4.0 licence.

Systematic review first published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine (2025), reprinted in full under its CC BY 4.0 licence.

No plain-language summary has been written for this reprint yet. The authors' abstract and full text follow, unchanged apart from layout.

Educational summary of research findings; not medical advice. Discuss care decisions with a qualified clinician.

Bottom line

What the evidence supports

How to read it

No plain-language summary has been written for this reprint yet. The authors' abstract and full text follow, unchanged apart from layout.

Limitations

The findings apply to the included study populations and may not generalise to every person or setting.

Disclaimer

Educational summary of research findings; not medical advice. Discuss care decisions with a qualified clinician.

The paper

Full manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intact meniscus roots are a prerequisite for normal meniscal function, including even distribution of compressive forces across the knee joint. An injury to the root disrupts the hoop strength of the meniscus and may lead to its extrusion and the development of osteoarthritis. A medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is often thought to have a primary degenerative pathogenesis. However, there is mention of some cases of MMPRTs where the patients have a solely traumatic injury to a previously healthy meniscus.

Purpose

To describe a subpopulation of patients with traumatic MMPRT.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.

Methods

The Web of Science database (www.webofscience.com) was queried using the Medical Subject Headings term “medial root tear.” Articles were reviewed, and those evaluated for MMPRTs in a degenerative meniscus were excluded. A total of 25 articles describing cases of acute traumatic causes were included in this study. For these articles, the patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and concomitant injuries evaluated were recorded and pooled.

Results

The search revealed 660 articles, and 25 were selected for inclusion. A total of 113 patients with a traumatic MMPRT were identified and included in this review. The study population had a mean age of 27.1 years and a high share of men (64%). Also, this review displays how most patients with traumatic MMPRTs also suffer concomitant injuries (68%).

Conclusion

The findings in this review support our hypothesis that there is a unique subgroup with acute traumatic MMPRTs that have unique patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and combined injuries, compared with previously published reviews on MMPRTs.

Keywords: medial meniscus posterior root tear; meniscus root tear; traumatic meniscus root tear

Introduction

The menisci are critically important in maintaining a functional and healthy knee because of their role in force distribution and joint stability.2,9,38 Their attachment to the tibial plateau at the meniscus roots supports the conversion of the axial load from the femur into circumferential hoop stresses and results in an even distribution of forces at the articular cartilage.2,6,42 Loss of the root attachment leads to meniscal extrusion and increased peak cartilage contact pressure because of the reduced contact area.10,38,39,52 The link between meniscal dysfunction and osteoarthritis development has been well-established, especially in the setting of meniscus root tears.5,11,16,34,35,38

A meniscus root tear is defined as either an avulsion at the bony attachment site on the tibia or a complete radial tear within 1 cm from the insertion site.36,38 The lateral meniscus posterior root tears are more often found as a concomitant injury to an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear than the medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs).2,38,46 The MMPRT has historically been characterized as a precursor to degenerative joint disease.22,32,41,46 There is a common agreement on the need to repair lateral meniscus posterior root tears. 39 However, MMPRTs are often characterized as occurring secondary to knee degeneration rather than trauma, and there is debate on the efficacy of repair. 40 Factors commonly associated with degenerative MMPRT are obesity, female sex, older age, and varus alignment.3,14,15,21,64 Although much of the scientific literature is focused on degenerative MMPRT,1,4,32,53,54 acute traumatic MMPRTs may also occur. Acute traumatic MMPRTs are likely better operative candidates because of tissue quality and the absence of degenerative changes secondary to the tear, and this group should be distinguished from patients with a degenerative origin.1,54 However, the studies reporting on patients with MMPRT are often small and heterogeneous, and the knowledge on this subgroup of traumatic root tears is therefore fragmented and requires investigation through a focused systematic review. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify patients with traumatic MMPRT. We hypothesized that there would be a subgroup of patients with MMPRT with a traumatic origin rather than a degenerative pathogenesis and that these patients would have different demographic characteristics and injury mechanisms when compared with the general population that sustains MMPRT.

Methods

Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature review was performed on December 28, 2022, using “medial root tear” as a Medical Subject Headings term in the Web of Science database (www.webofscience.com). Only publications with either an English or a German abstract published after January 1, 2002, were considered eligible for inclusion.

To identify articles presenting MMPRT cases with an acute traumatic origin, the first author (K.M.) reviewed all titles, abstracts, methods, and patient characteristics. An acute traumatic origin was defined as a specific traumatic event with a detailed injury mechanism or with a severity of injuries, suggesting that the injury event must be acute traumatic. Thereafter, the full-text publications were reviewed to finalize the inclusion and extract data. Reference lists of selected articles were reviewed to search for additional relevant publications. Articles without patient-level data or with a clear degenerative origin of the MMPRT were excluded. Editorial comments, technical notes only focusing on surgical methods, biomechanical studies on cadaveric specimens and animals, and other reviews and meta-analyses were also excluded. Corresponding authors were contacted by email to request missing data or clarify whether or not patients’ injuries were caused by trauma. We excluded patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grades of >1 or Outerbridge classification grades of >2 to focus on acute traumatic injuries. To limit the inclusion of patients with a likely degenerative cause of their meniscal tear in cases where there was doubt about whether articles should be included, a discussion among the first author and 2 of the senior authors (A.G.G. and E.I.) was held to reach a consensus.

Results

The search yielded a total of 660 articles. After screening the titles, abstracts, methods, and patient characteristics, 87 articles were included for full-text review (Figure 1). Out of 60 corresponding authors contacted, 28 replied and helped clarify the inclusion/exclusion criteria by adding further patient-level data. After full-text review, obtaining supplemental injury information from the corresponding authors (if necessary), and author discussion, 25 articles were selected for the final inclusion (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. A flowchart for the inclusion of data for review.

In total, 113 patients, with a mean age of 27.1 years (range, 12-61 years [SD, 11.2]), were pooled for analyses. Overall, sex was reported for 93 patients—21 women and 72 men (Table 1).

Table 1. Patient Characteristics Across the Included Studies a
Paper No. b AuthorsStudy DesignYear of PublicationNo. of PatientsSex c Age, d Years
1 8Engelsohn et alCase report200721M + 1F19.5
2 55Ra et alCase series201576M + 1F28.9
3 29Kidron and TheinCase series20021110M + 1F27.4
4 19Hiranaka et alCase report201911M34
5 24Jones et alReview with case reports201051M + 4F45.2
6 30Kim et alCase series20101010M30.6
7 43Lee et alCase report200911F54
8 56Seil et alCase report201111M21
9 61Wilson and JohnsonCase report201121M + 1F16.5
10 9Feucht et alCase report201411M17
11 31Koenig et alReview with case report200911M15
12 62Wilson et alCohort study20181210M + 2F15.3
13 22Iversen and KrogsgaardCase report201421M + 1F12.5
14 63Xue et alSurgical note with case reports201833M43
15 59Sonnery-Cottet et alCase report201422M13
16 60Tenfelde et alCase report202211F20
17 45Matava and KimCase report201111M12
18 47Naraghi and WhiteReview with case report201611M39
19 44MarzoReview with case report200911M43
20 57Sharif et alReview with case report202011F26
21 7Dzidzishvili et alCase-control study20211816M + 2F28
22 32Kosy et alCase series201820
23 28Karpinski et alCohort study202364M + 2F36.3
24 58Shieh et alCross-sectional study201322F15
25 23Jones et alReview with case report200611F15

a F, female; M, male.

b The superscripted numbers refer to numbers in the reference list.

c The number of male and female patients.

d Age is presented in means.

Detailed reports on injuries other than the meniscal tear were available for 106 patients (94%) (Table 2 and Appendix Table A1, available in the online version of this article). A total of 77 patients had such concomitant injuries (68%), while 29 patients had an isolated MMPRT (26%). Of patients with concomitant injuries, 74 (66%) had injuries that involved either the ACL (n = 32 patients), the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) (n = 10 patients), or both (n = 32 patients) (Appendix Table A1, available online). Using the Schenck Classification of Knee Dislocations, 10 (KD I-V), the most common group was the KD I, which applied in 42 patients (37%), followed by the KD III (n = 14 patients) and the KD V (n = 10 patients). The KD III involves both the ACL, the PCL, and 1 of the collateral ligaments. The KD V is defined as a multiligament injury combined with a periarticular fracture. Some of the patients had other injuries (n = 22 patients)—such as fractures, chondral damage, and concomitant lateral root tear (Table 2). These pathologies occurred with the MMPRT, in combination with one another, or in combination with tears of the cruciate ligaments.

Table 2. Distribution of the Schenck Classification and Other Concomitant Injuries Across Different Types of Traumatic Events a
Injury Mechanism
Concomitant InjuriesHigh Energy/Trauma InjurySports TraumaFall InjuryVarious TraumaUnknown TraumaTotal
KD I42743442
KD II000011
KD III5510314
KD IV000077
KD V1100810
Other concomitant injuries b 0913013
No concomitant injuries01838029
Unknown050117

a KD, Schenck Classification of Knee Dislocations; LMPRT, Lateral meniscus posterior root tear.

b Other concomitant injuries included injuries such as fractures, LMPRT, and chondral lesions.

The injury mechanism for each patient was reviewed to allow grouping into categories depending on the injury event—including traffic accident, sporting trauma, fall, various known trauma, and unknown trauma (Table 2). The mechanism was a traffic accident for 10 patients, all of whom had a concomitant ligament injury—including the ACL, the PCL, or both. Sporting injuries made up the largest group of patients (n = 59). The injuries were sustained during several sporting activities—such as football, soccer, basketball, and so forth. These patients had a binary distribution, as they either suffered from an isolated root tear or a tear combined with a ligament injury. The highest number of isolated root tears was found in this group. In patients with a fall as the documented mechanism of injury (n = 8), there were a variety of concomitant injuries—including PCL tears, ACL tears, and chondral lesions. The group that denoted “various known trauma” included 13 patients and had the highest share of isolated tears (62%)—with only a few patients with single ligament tears and none with a multiligament injury.

In 23 out of the 113 patients, the injury mechanism was not distinguishable at a patient level. Of these injuries, 20 were pooled as traffic accidents or sports injuries in the original publication and were denoted “other injuries” for the analyses. All the patients in this group suffered from ligament tears; most had a multiligament tear (n = 19 patients). None of the patients in this group had an isolated MMPRT.

Discussion

Traumatic MMPRTs have not been reviewed since Feucht et al 9 evaluated this group in 2014. The present analyses found a relatively young age in the present pooled patient cohort, with a mean age of 27.1 years. This included a significant number of patients <30 years old (62%) and patients <40 years old (72%) at the time of injury. The oldest patient, included in the study by Jones et al, 24 was 61 years old at the time of injury. This article also included a 52-year-old patient. Another paper, by Xue et al, 63 included a patient aged 59 years. Two other studies included patients aged 54 years (Lee et al 43 and Karpinski et al 28 ). In contrast to the young age of patients in this review, several reviews on MMPRT have reported16,21,33 that mean patient age ranged from 51.4 to 58.2 years. Also, the presence of degenerative cartilage—classified by radiographs or arthroscopic inspection—was low across the included studies. Studies by Kamimura et al,26,27 Kamatsuki et al, 25 and Okazaki et al 48 showed that 50% to 69% of patients had a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of >1 at the time of surgery. This indicates some level of osteoarthritis/chondral wear. The younger age and lower incidence of chondral wear suggest that traumatic MMPRT seems to be a different entity from those with a dominant degenerative path.

Our study population also showed a different sex distribution, with 64% being men and 19% being women, whereas most other reports on MMPRT predominantly involve women. The study by Hwang et al 21 included 94% women. Okazaki et al48-51 reported between 80% and 85% women in their MMPRT groups across several articles. Studies from Hiranaka et al17,18,20 reported that between 69% and 93% of their study populations were women. In a report by Krych et al, 33 in which the medial and lateral root tears were compared, 56% of women were reported to be in the MMPRT group. In that study, it was noted that the lateral meniscus posterior root tears group is younger and usually has concomitant ACL tears, suggesting a traumatic origin—whereas the MMPRT group is older and has more concomitant degenerative changes. The impression from reading the literature is that a standard MMPRT patient is a middle-aged woman—while the present review shows that this might be completely different for traumatic MMPRTs. This finding aligns with the hypotheses of LaPrade et al 37 in a recent editorial commentary.

When considering injury mechanisms, the most frequently reported cause of tear across the cohort was sports-related trauma, followed by unknown trauma and various known traumas such as those during jumping, bicycling, fitnesss, and so forth. The level of detail in the included studies also allowed analyses showing that most patients had a concomitant injury (68%). These were most frequently ligamentous injuries, fractures, chondral damages, or some combination of these. Ligamentous injuries made up the biggest group of concomitant injuries and were further categorized using the KD. 13 The relatively high degree of KD III to V injuries, involving multiple ligaments and fractures, shows how high energy has likely been involved in most of the injury settings. This contrasts with a degenerative tear that can debut spontaneously or during light activities such as walking, turning, or light running10,22—often referred to as microtrauma.

Another sign of high forces acting on the knee at injury is the low level of isolated meniscal tears (26%). This is not surprising, however, as the medial meniscus acts as a secondary stabilizer for the anterior translation of the knee12,40 and likely also plays a role in restraining anteromedial/posteromedial rotation. For a healthy medial meniscus to sustain forces large enough to cause a lesion in its posterior root, it almost seems necessary that other structures tear in that same sequence of injuries. Although there is very little evidence linking specific trauma mechanisms to meniscal tear types, one could speculate—based on basic biomechanical knowledge—whether a common injury mechanism for an MMPRT tear combines knee torque, valgus load, flexion, or hyperextension. 12 A few included articles have described injury mechanisms in detail and found such a combination of forces. Overall, it was difficult to identify any common injury patterns based on the included studies, as several other injury mechanisms were also observed.

There are some limitations to this review. The individual age and sex of patients were not available because of incomplete reporting in the index studies and unavailability upon contacting study authors. Furthermore, we did not have complete details about patients’ grades of osteoarthritis—defined as the Kellgren-Lawrence grade, the Outerbridge classification, any other classification, or the body mass index for all patients. Although we inquired about osteoarthritis classification from all corresponding authors, only a minority of patients had such data at final analyses. Given the relatively young age and known traumatic event of the collapsed cohort, authors may not have found it necessary to seek and include this information. More such details could have further supported or refuted our hypothesis that degenerative and traumatic MMPRTs have different demographic and injury-related characteristics.

Conclusion

The findings in this review support our hypothesis that there would be a unique subgroup with acute traumatic MMPRTs that would have unique patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, and combined injuries compared with previously published reviews on MMPRTs.

Supplemental Material

Supplementary material: sj-pdf-1-ajs-10.1177_03635465241237254 – Supplemental material for Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review — available with the version of record.

Declarations

Submitted August 29, 2023; accepted January 5, 2024.

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: A.G.G. has received consulting fees from Smith & Nephew, speaking fees from Ossur and Arthrex, and support for education from Stryker Corporation and Medwest Associates. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

An online CME course associated with this article is available for 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ at https://education.sportsmed.org/Public/Catalog/Home.aspx?CourseSearch=1&Criteria=9&Option=25. In accordance with the standards of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), it is the policy of The American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine that authors, editors, and planners disclose to the learners all financial relationships during the past 12 months with any commercial interest (A ‘commercial interest’ is any entity producing, marketing, re-selling, or distributing health care goods or services consumed by, or used on, patients). Any and all disclosures are provided in the online journal CME area which is provided to all participants before they actually take the CME activity. In accordance with AOSSM policy, authors, editors, and planners’ participation in this educational activity will be predicated upon timely submission and review of AOSSM disclosure. Noncompliance will result in an author/editor or planner to be stricken from participating in this CME activity.

ORCID iD: Kristine Mundal https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9360-2045

Sources

References

64 references, in the article's own order. Citation numbers in the text are this list's numbers (62 records are cited).

  1. Meniscus repair part 2: technical aspects, biologic augmentation, rehabilitation, and outcomes

    Arner JW, Ruzbarsky JJ, Vidal AF, Frank RM.

    2022J Am Acad Orthop Surg 30(13):613–619 · PMID 35439222doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01153

  2. Meniscal root tears: a decade of research on their relevant anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment

    Banovetz MT, Roethke LC, Rodriguez AN, LaPrade RF.

    2022Arch Bone Jt Surg 10(5):366–380 · PMID 35755791doi:10.22038/ABJS.2021.60054.2958

  3. Meniscal root tears: significance, diagnosis, and treatment

    Bhatia S, LaPrade CM, Ellman MB, LaPrade RF.

    2014Am J Sports Med 42(12):3016–3030 · PMID 24623276doi:10.1177/0363546514524162

  4. Evidence-based rationale for treatment of meniscal lesions in athletes

    Borque KA, Jones M, Cohen M, Johnson D, Williams A.

    2022Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30(5):1511–1519 · PMID 34415368doi:10.1007/s00167-021-06694-6

  5. Utilization of transtibial centralization suture best minimizes extrusion and restores tibiofemoral contact mechanics for anatomic medial meniscal root repairs in a cadaveric model

    Daney BT, Aman ZS, Krob JJ

    2019Am J Sports Med 47(7):1591–1600 · PMID 31091129doi:10.1177/0363546519844250

  6. Peripheral stabilization suture to address meniscal extrusion in a revision meniscal root repair: surgical technique and rehabilitation protocol

    Dean RS, DePhillipo NN, Monson JK, LaPrade RF.

    2020Arthrosc Tech 9(8) · PMID 32874903doi:10.1016/j.eats.2020.04.022

  7. A comparison of the transtibial pullout technique and all-inside meniscal repair in medial meniscus posterior root tear: prognostic factors and midterm clinical outcomes

    Dzidzishvili L, López-Torres II, Sáez D, Arguello JM, Calvo E.

    2021J Orthop 26:130–134 · PMID 34434000doi:10.1016/j.jor.2021.08.001

  8. Marginal fractures of the medial tibial plateau: possible association with medial meniscal root tear

    Engelsohn E, Umans H, Difelice GS.

    2007Skeletal Radiol 36(1):73–76 · PMID 16570169doi:10.1007/s00256-006-0089-1

  9. Simultaneous avulsion fracture of the posterior medial and posterior lateral meniscus root: a case report and review of the literature

    Feucht MJ, Salzmann GM, Pestka JM, Südkamp NP, Niemeyer P.

    2014Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(4):509–514 · PMID 24337588doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1915-2

  10. The natural history of medial meniscal root tears: a biomechanical and clinical case perspective

    Floyd ER, Rodriguez AN, Falaas KL

    2021Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:744065 · PMID 34631684doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.744065

  11. Meniscal root tears and extrusion are significantly associated with the development of accelerated knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative

    Foreman SC, Liu Y, Nevitt MC

    2021Cartilage 13(suppl 1) · PMID 32567341doi:10.1177/1947603520934525

  12. The basic science of human knee menisci: structure, composition, and function

    Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA.

    2012Sports Health 4(4):340–351 · PMID 23016106doi:10.1177/1941738111429419

  13. Classifications in brief: the Schenck classification of knee dislocations

    Goebel CP, Domes C.

    2020Clin Orthop Relat Res 478(6):1368–1372 · PMID 32106128doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000001186

  14. Alignment factors affecting the medial meniscus extrusion increases the risk of osteoarthritis development

    Goto N, Okazaki K, Akiyama T

    2019Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(8):2617–2623 · PMID 30456569doi:10.1007/s00167-018-5286-7

  15. Medial posterior meniscal root tears are associated with development or worsening of medial tibiofemoral cartilage damage: the multicenter osteoarthritis study

    Guermazi A, Hayashi D, Jarraya M

    2013Radiology 268(3):814–821 · PMID 23696679doi:10.1148/radiol.13122544

  16. Medial meniscus extrusion as a predictor for a poor prognosis in patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee

    Hashimoto S, Terauchi M, Hatayama K, Ohsawa T, Omodaka T, Chikuda H.

    2021Knee 31:164–171 · PMID 34214956doi:10.1016/j.knee.2021.06.003

  17. The distance between the tibial tunnel aperture and meniscal root attachment is correlated with meniscal healing status following transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear

    Hiranaka T, Furumatsu T, Kamatsuki Y

    2020Knee 27(3):899–905 · PMID 32249020doi:10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.025

  18. A repair technique using two simple stitches reduces the short-term postoperative medial meniscus extrusion after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear

    Hiranaka T, Furumatsu T, Masuda S

    2020Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30(5):901–908 · PMID 32157399doi:10.1007/s00590-020-02647-w

  19. Bilateral anterior cruciate ligament tear combined with medial meniscus posterior root tear

    Hiranaka T, Furumatsu T, Okazaki Y

    2019Acta Med Okayama 73(6):523–528 · PMID 31871335doi:10.18926/AMO/57717

  20. Steep medial tibial slope and prolonged delay to surgery are associated with bilateral medial meniscus posterior root tear

    Hiranaka T, Furumatsu T, Okazaki Y

    2021Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(4):1052–1057 · PMID 32488369doi:10.1007/s00167-020-06079-1

  21. Risk factors for medial meniscus posterior root tear

    Hwang BY, Kim SJ, Lee SW

    2012Am J Sports Med 40(7):1606–1610 · PMID 22582224doi:10.1177/0363546512447792

  22. Tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior root of the medial meniscus in children

    Iversen JV, Krogsgaard MR.

    2014Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(1):109–111 · PMID 23160847doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2295-9

  23. Medial meniscus posterior root attachment injury and degeneration: MRI findings

    Jones AO, Houang MT, Low RS, Wood DG.

    2006Australas Radiol 50(4):306–313 · PMID 16884414doi:10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01586.x

  24. Repair of the posterior root of the medial meniscus

    Jones C, Reddy S, Ma CB.

    2010Knee 17(1):77–80 · PMID 19740665doi:10.1016/j.knee.2009.06.010

  25. Accurate placement of a tibial tunnel significantly improves meniscal healing and clinical outcomes at 1 year after medial meniscus posterior root repair

    Kamatsuki Y, Furumatsu T, Hiranaka T

    2021Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(11):3715–3723 · PMID 33388829doi:10.1007/s00167-020-06376-9

  26. Medial meniscus tear morphology and related clinical symptoms in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis

    Kamimura M, Umehara J, Takahashi A, Aizawa T, Itoi E.

    2015Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(1):158–163 · PMID 24638975doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2939-z

  27. Meniscal tear morphology independently affects pain relief following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in middle-aged patients

    Kamimura M, Umehara J, Takahashi A

    2019Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(8):2460–2467 · PMID 30374574doi:10.1007/s00167-018-5238-2

  28. Etiology of posterior meniscus root tears: medial vs. lateral

    Karpinski K, Forkel P, Häner M, Bierke S, Petersen W

    2023Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(1):429–437 · PMID 35076768doi:10.1007/s00402-022-04347-y

  29. Radial tears associated with cleavage tears of the medial meniscus in athletes

    Kidron A, Thein R.

    2002Arthroscopy 18(3):254–256 · PMID 11877610doi:10.1053/jars.2002.30650

  30. Posterior root tear of the medial meniscus in multiple knee ligament injuries

    Kim YJ, Kim JG, Chang SH, Shim JC, Kim SB, Lee MY.

    2010Knee 17(5):324–328 · PMID 19914834doi:10.1016/j.knee.2009.10.001

  31. Meniscal root tears: diagnosis and treatment

    Koenig JH, Ranawat AS, Umans HR, Difelice GS.

    2009Arthroscopy 25(9):1025–1032 · PMID 19732642doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.03.015

  32. Meniscal root tears occur frequently in multi-ligament knee injury and can be predicted by associated MRI injury patterns

    Kosy JD, Matteliano L, Rastogi A, Pearce D, Whelan DB.

    2018Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(12):3731–3737 · PMID 29872868doi:10.1007/s00167-018-5009-0

  33. Medial versus lateral meniscus root tears: is there a difference in injury presentation, treatment decisions, and surgical repair outcomes?

    Krych AJ, Bernard CD, Kennedy NI

    2020Arthroscopy 36(4):1135–1141 · PMID 31973989doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.098

  34. Non-operative management of medial meniscus posterior horn root tears is associated with worsening arthritis and poor clinical outcome at 5-year follow-up

    Krych AJ, Reardon PJ, Johnson NR

    2017Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(2):383–389 · PMID 27761625doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4359-8

  35. Prospective consecutive clinical outcomes after transtibial root repair for posterior meniscal root tears: a multicenter study

    Krych AJ, Song BM, Nauert RF

    2022Orthop J Sports Med 10(2) · PMID 35237699doi:10.1177/23259671221079794

  36. Meniscal root tears: a classification system based on tear morphology

    LaPrade CM, James EW, Cram TR, Feagin JA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF.

    2015Am J Sports Med 43(2):363–369 · PMID 25451789doi:10.1177/0363546514559684

  37. Editorial commentary: comparing medial and lateral meniscal root tears is like comparing apples and oranges

    LaPrade RF, DePhillipo NN, Larson CM.

    2020Arthroscopy 36(4):1142–1144 · PMID 32247410doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.016

  38. Meniscal root tears: solving the silent epidemic

    LaPrade RF, Floyd ER, Carlson GB, Moatshe G, Chahla J, Monson JK.

    2021J Arthrosc Surg Sports Med 2(1):47–57

  39. Posterior lateral meniscal root and oblique radial tears: the biomechanical evidence supports repair of these tears, although long-term clinical studies are necessary

    LaPrade RF, Geeslin AG, Chahla J

    2022Arthroscopy 38(12):3095–3101 · PMID 36462774doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2022.09.015

  40. Medial meniscal root tears: fix it or leave it alone

    LaPrade RF, Johnson DL, Chahla J, Geeslin AG, Blake MH

  41. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine: current controversies for treatment of meniscus root tears

    Lee DR, Reinholz AK, Till SE

    2022Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 15(4):231–243 · PMID 35476312doi:10.1007/s12178-022-09759-2

  42. Outcomes of medial meniscal posterior root repair during proximal tibial osteotomy: is root repair beneficial?

    Lee DW, Lee SH, Kim JG.

    2020Arthroscopy 36(9):2466–2475 · PMID 32389775doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.038

  43. Radial tears in the roots of the posterior horns of both the medial and lateral menisci combined with anterior cruciate ligament tear: a case report

    Lee JH, Hwang BY, Lim YJ, Kim KH, Song JH.

    2009Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(11):1340–1343 · PMID 19554310doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0839-4

  44. Medial meniscus posterior horn avulsion

    Marzo JM.

    2009J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(5):276–283 · PMID 19411639doi:10.5435/00124635-200905000-00002

  45. Tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior root of the medial meniscus in a skeletally-immature child—a case report

    Matava MJ, Kim YM.

    2011Knee 18(1):62–65 · PMID 20199863doi:10.1016/j.knee.2010.01.007

  46. Posterior meniscus root tears: associated pathologies to assist as diagnostic tools

    Matheny LM, Ockuly AC, Steadman JR, LaPrade RF.

    2015Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(10):3127–3131 · PMID 24866130doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3073-7

  47. Imaging of athletic injuries of knee ligaments and menisci: sports imaging series

    Naraghi AM, White LM.

    2016Radiology 281(1):23–40 · PMID 27643766doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152320

  48. Medial meniscus posterior root repair influences sagittal length and coronal inclination of the anterior cruciate ligament: a retrospective study

    Okazaki Y, Furumatsu T, Kodama Y

    2023Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33(4):1255–1262 · PMID 35593940doi:10.1007/s00590-022-03285-0

  49. Steep posterior slope and shallow concave shape of the medial tibial plateau are risk factors for medial meniscus posterior root tears

    Okazaki Y, Furumatsu T, Kodama Y

    2021Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(1):44–50 · PMID 31243503doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05590-4

  50. Pullout repair of the medial meniscus posterior root tear reduces proton density-weighted imaging signal intensity of the medial meniscus

    Okazaki Y, Furumatsu T, Masuda S

    2018Acta Med Okayama 72(5):493–498 · PMID 30369606doi:10.18926/AMO/56247

  51. Medial meniscus posterior root repair decreases posteromedial extrusion of the medial meniscus during knee flexion

    Okazaki Y, Furumatsu T, Okazaki Y

    2020Knee 27(1):132–139 · PMID 31882388doi:10.1016/j.knee.2019.09.005

  52. Biomechanical consequences of a complete radial tear adjacent to the medial meniscus posterior root attachment site: in situ pull-out repair restores derangement of joint mechanics

    Padalecki JR, Jansson KS, Smith SD

    2014Am J Sports Med 42(3):699–707 · PMID 24585675doi:10.1177/0363546513499314

  53. Examining the efficacy of medial meniscus posterior root repair: a meta-analysis and systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes

    Perry AK, Lavoie-Gagne O, Knapik DM

    2023Am J Sports Med 51(7):1914–1926 · PMID 35384728doi:10.1177/03635465221077271

  54. Posterior root tear of the medial and lateral meniscus

    Petersen W, Forkel P, Feucht MJ, Zantop T, Imhoff AB, Brucker PU.

    2014Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(2):237–255 · PMID 24323059doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1873-8

  55. Traumatic posterior root tear of the medial meniscus in patients with severe medial instability of the knee

    Ra HJ, Ha JK, Jang HS, Kim JG.

    2015Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(10):3121–3126 · PMID 25217312doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3274-0

  56. A clinical sign to detect root avulsions of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus

    Seil R, Dück K, Pape D.

    2011Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(12):2072–2075 · PMID 21607738doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1550-9

  57. Magnetic resonance imaging of the meniscal roots

    Sharif B, Ashraf T, Saifuddin A.

    2020Skeletal Radiol 49(5):661–676 · PMID 31915856doi:10.1007/s00256-020-03374-3v

  58. Meniscus tear patterns in relation to skeletal immaturity: children versus adolescents

    Shieh A, Bastrom T, Roocroft J, Edmonds EW, Pennock AT.

    2013Am J Sports Med 41(12):2779–2783 · PMID 24071370doi:10.1177/0363546513504286

  59. Root avulsion of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus in skeletally immature patients

    Sonnery-Cottet B, Mortati R, Archbold P, Gadea F, Clechet J, Thaunat M.

    2014Knee 21(6):1291–1296 · PMID 25115656doi:10.1016/j.knee.2014.07.001

  60. Isolierter traumatischer Innenmeniskuswurzelabriss des jungen Erwachsenen

    Tenfelde O, Balke M, Fink M, Höher J.

    2022Arthroskopie 35:213–217

  61. Posterior horn medial meniscal root repair with cruciate ligament/medial collateral ligament combined injuries

    Wilson BF, Johnson DL.

    2011Orthopedics 34(12):986–988 · PMID 22147216doi:10.3928/01477447-20111021-22

  62. Incidence, presentation, and treatment of pediatric and adolescent meniscal root injuries

    Wilson PL, Wyatt CW, Romero J, Sabatino MJ, Ellis HB.

    2018Orthop J Sports Med 6(11) · PMID 30480006doi:10.1177/2325967118803888

  63. A technique combining "U" shape suture and shared tunneling to treat the posterior cruciate ligament rupture and posterior root tears of the medial meniscus

    Xue XH, Lin J, Qi WH, Pan XY.

    2018J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):265 · PMID 30348196doi:10.1186/s13018-018-0973-0

  64. Meniscal ramp lesions and root tears: a review of the current literature

    Zhou ML, Haley CC.

    2021Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 29(3):158–167 · PMID 34398121doi:10.1097/JSA.0000000000000321

Article record

The record

Status

Living reprint · journal article Journal version available

Status
Version of record: The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2025
Journal version
The American Journal of Sports Medicine (2025) · doi:10.1177/03635465241237254
Confirmed
2024-04-10
Licence
CC BY 4.0

This reprint has no DOI of its own: cite the journal article.

The journal's version is the version of record. This page re-typesets it under the article's licence; where they differ, the journal's version is authoritative.

Version history

  1. Published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine2024-04-10
  2. Living reprint on Literature Decoded2026-10-01
  3. Reprinted here2026-10-01
  4. This HTML2026-10-01

Cite this article

Citation
Mundal K, Geeslin AG, Solheim E, Inderhaug E. Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2025;53(1):228–233. doi:10.1177/03635465241237254
BibTeX
@article{Mundal2025Differences,
  title   = {Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review},
  author  = {Kristine Mundal and Andrew G. Geeslin and Eirik Solheim and Eivind Inderhaug},
  journal = {The American Journal of Sports Medicine},
  year    = {2025},
  volume  = {53},
  number  = {1},
  pages   = {228–233},
  doi     = {10.1177/03635465241237254},
  pmid    = {38600780}
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review
AU  - Kristine Mundal
AU  - Andrew G. Geeslin
AU  - Eirik Solheim
AU  - Eivind Inderhaug
JO  - The American Journal of Sports Medicine
PY  - 2025
VL  - 53
IS  - 1
SP  - 228
EP  - 233
DO  - 10.1177/03635465241237254
SN  - 0363-5465
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241237254
ER  -

Cite the original article (the version of record), not this reprint.

Take it with you

One self-contained HTML file: the text, data and figures, readable offline.

Disclaimer and limitations

Educational summary of research findings; not medical advice. Discuss care decisions with a qualified clinician.

The findings apply to the included study populations and may not generalise to every person or setting.

Licence and attribution

This page reproduces Differences Between Traumatic and Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review by Kristine Mundal, Andrew G. Geeslin, Eirik Solheim, Eivind Inderhaug, first published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2025;53(1):228–233, doi:10.1177/03635465241237254, PMID 38600780, PMC11689786. © 2024 The Author(s). It is used under the CC BY 4.0 licence.

Changes made:

The words, data, figures and conclusions are the authors’. Literature Decoded is not the publisher of record and does not claim endorsement by the authors or the journal. The version of record is the journal’s; cite it.

Licence statement in the article: “This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).”

Are you an author of this article? Claim it or ask us to take it down.

Cite this article

Living reprint · journal article